Smithfield
council rezones ag land west of town to residential
By Di Lewis
January 27, 2006 | SMITHFIELD -- Housing for low- and
moderate-income families will not be an option, said
the Neighborhood Nonprofit Housing Corporation, after
the City Council unanimously approved a resolution to
rezone agricultural to residential land Wednesday night.
The NNHC wanted to combine with Mickelson Development
to create an 80-home subdivision on land that extends
from 800 West to 500 West and from Saddleback Road to
100 North.
Mayor Chad Downs opened the meeting for a public hearing
and residents of Smithfield took turns expressing their
opinions on the proposed rezoning.
"We have all these questions about Smithfield population
growth, about when we should allow it and where. But
my question is: if not now, when? And if not here, where?"
said Councilman Dennis Watkins. "I think this is the
time and the place."
The land that was being rezoned was mostly agricultural
land that was still viable, said Jeff Barnes from the
Natural Resources Conservation Service. Barnes said
86 percent of Smithfield residents believe open space
and farmland is important to their community and that
the wishes of citizens should not be taken lightly.
Lamont Poulsen, of Poulsen Livestock and one of the
owners of the property adjacent to the rezoning, said
it is necessary to have a buffer zone between agricultural
and residential zones, because history has shown that
even if they promise not to, residents next to agricultural
areas will complain about the "cattle, flies, smells,
and lights" associated with farming and that it just
doesn't mix with high density residential areas.
Kim Datwyler, spokeswoman for the NNHC, says there
will be a buffer zone between the areas and that residents
will know they are buying next to the "sight, sounds,
and smells" that come with agricultural areas. The main
concerns, Datwyler said, are that there is no affordable
housing in Smithfield, especially for young, very low
income families, and rights of property owners to sell
their land are being infringed upon.
"The cheapest lot in Smithfield right now is $48,000,"
said Councilman Brent Buttars. "They offer it at $30,000-$38,000
a lot. A lot of these families are from this area --
they're our kids. If we don't rezone now, we will be
forced to accept it later."
One of the owners trying to sell property, Mark Robinson,
said, "I have lost my animal rights and I can't grow
anything in this weedy, rocky orchard. Why won't the
council let us sell our property when we are all working
together? What are my rights as a property owner? What
do I do? How do I develop my property?"
Councilwoman Kriss Monson continued to oppose the
proposal, saying it is important to control the rate
of Smithfield population growth. Monson proposed an
amendment that would rezone three-fourths of the requested
land.
The amended proposal passed unanimously. "This is
just a win-win situation," Monson said. "We have a buffer
zone for the agriculture and plenty of room for continued
growth.
However, Datwyler said this will not provide the low
income housing that the NNHC was hoping for and insists
is greatly needed.
"By not rezoning that one-fourth of the land, they
took 21 of our 42 lots," Datwyler said. "We appreciate
their intent, but I don't think the council fully understood
the implications of approving the amendment. We'll have
to look at the numbers and see if it is still financially
feasible. We certainly won't be able to offer the lots
at the price we wanted to."
"It was a sneaky thing to do," said Kevin Allen, the
representative for Mickelson Development.
In other business, the council listened to James Marshall,
chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission, as he
gave a brief summary of future growth in Smithfield.
Marshall said population growth rate has gone from 3
to 5 percent in the last five years and the population
is expected to grow from 9,000 to 16,000 residents in
13 years.
The main concern, Marshall said, is whether Smithfield
infrastructure is equipped to keep up with the current
growth rate. He said that unless growth is restrained,
"schools and emergency services could become overstressed.
"I don't want to oppose growth. I just want to do
it at a rate that does not overtax our infrastructure,"
Marshall said.
The council also unanimously approved Justin Bennett's
request for a two-lot minor subdivision and watched
a summary presentation on the fire that occurred at
the pallet company last November.
NW
MS |