HNC Home Page
News Business Arts & Life Sports Opinion Calendar Archive About Us
A NEW MESSAGE: An Iraqi man with a spray-paint can turns Arabic graffiti into smiley faces shortly before the Iraqi elections. Click for an Aggie's perspective from Baghdad. / Photo by David J. Jenkins
Today's word on
journalism

Monday, January 31, 2005

When words go to war:

"Words go to war as surely as soldiers do. They can be used to inspire troops, strike fear into the heart of the enemy or persuade neutral parties. . . . The careful selection of words in war is almost always a calculated attempt to manipulate perceptions. Whether an act of violence is called a 'suicide bombing' or a homicide bombing' depends more on the politics of the speaker than on any sincere attempt to describe objective reality. Even when the language of war is mechanical or colorless it may be deliberate, an attempt to shield both civilians and soldiers from the horrors of modern conflict."

--Michael Keane, author and educator, 2005 (Thanks to alert WORDster Brad Knickerbocker)

The big and the beautiful

By Nick Robbins

December 21, 2004 | Our society is continually evolving with new social norms and levels of political acceptance. One might, for example, be reprimanded for making fun of a handicapped person, frowned at for joking about homosexuals, or sued for criticizing minorities. In our world of politeness and political correctness, we have padded every opportunity for offense or misconception; however, we have overlooked one group of people, the overweight.

Why is it still OK to make fat jokes? Why can we acceptably criticize their way of life? Like any other handicap, obesity can be a genetic disorder, and yet it is still socially acceptable to make fun of them.

As a society if we are going to demand sensitivity, understanding and compassion to everyone, we need to start practicing what we preach. We aren't dealing with a minority group anymore. The overweight and obese are now outnumbering.

I wouldn't consider myself to be a fat person, but I have a good solid build. Recently I went shopping for a pair of jeans. After trying on a pair or two, the sales associate -- PC term for pimple-faced, high school drop-out, pee-on -- told me her store didn't carry clothes for someone like me. Someone like me? I felt like I had been dropped right back into the Civil Rights era, with comments like "those people" and "your kind."

Someone like me? What did she mean? People with brown hair? People with green eyes? Democrats? No, she clarified for me, someone with such an "athletic build." I commend her effort in trying to ease the pain; I hadn't heard "athletic build" before. Chubby, solid, big-boned, husky, even fat, but never athletically built. When I think athletically built, I think of Lance Armstrong, Michael Jordan and the entire men's Olympic gymnastic team, but not me.

Imagine if an African American was told that; a gay man; a quadriplegic; a woman. That store would be slapped with a class-action lawsuit faster than the sales associate could fold another sweater. But the overweight are forced to take the criticism. They are forced to shop at stores and departments with such alluring titles as big and tall, and plus-sized.

Let's be honest, what's the point of all this political correctness anyway? Is it supposed to make a sanitation engineer (janitor) feel better about getting paid $5.15 an hour? It seems everyone but the overweight has new and improved terms for jobs and titles. Mailman has been replaced with postal worker, stewardess with flight attendant, waitress and waiter with server. Actors and actresses are now being referred to as entertainers and artists. Someone with a disability is now deemed less-able. However, the fat are still just plain fat.

Efforts have been made to improve this. I remember horizontally challenged, and as I said before, solid, big-boned, barrel-chested -- the list goes on, but overall, the fat are still fat. It's so hard to try and remember all the correct terms. Is it terrorist or foreign freedom fighter? I don't want to offend anyone. Is all this really necessary? Wouldn't it be easier to avoid all this confusion and just be nice to everyone like our female parental units taught us when we younger?

NW
MS

Copyright 1997-2004 Utah State University Department of Journalism & Communication, Logan UT 84322, (435) 797-1000
Best viewed 800 x 600.