HNC Home Page
News Business Arts & Life Sports Opinion Calendar Archive About Us
DO THEY GET COLD FEET?: Ducks paddle upstream at Third Dam in Logan Canyon. / Photo by Mike Sweeney

Today's word on journalism

Friday, January 20, 2006

Variations on "truthiness":

"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please."

-- Mark Twain, author, newspaperman and humorist (1835-1910)

MENTORS WANTED: Media professionals in all fields wanted to serve as email mentors for journalism students. If interested, send email slugged "Mentors" to Ted Pease (tpease@cc.usu.edu)

Get smart -- intelligence is the fountain of youth

By Kevin Nielsen

December 5, 2005 | Ever since the start of time people have searched in vain for the fountain of youth or the holy grail, which as we learned from Indiana Jones holds the same powers. There may be an easier way to live longer. No, it's not a diet and no, it's not exercise.

It's intelligence.

The headline might seem like common sense "smarter children may enjoy longer lives." It's as simple as natural selection. The smarter people are the ones who should live longer. When push comes to shove pick up a book, watch the history channel or do some extra counting with Sesame Street. It just might let you live longer or at least your kids.

A recent study from the Harvard School of Public Health found that as childhood IQ scores rose so did longevity. The study followed children starting in 1922 until 1986. The kids had IQ scores starting at 135 with an average score of 151. Children with IQs of 130 or higher are considered gifted.

IQ shouldn't matter that much in how long someone lives unless they consistently make better lifestyle decisions when it comes to risk factors. The study did find that the socioeconomic factors of the children weren't reflected in the findings.

In the study a child with an IQ of 150 had a 44 percent lower risk of death than those with an IQ of 135. A lower risk of death is a pretty broad term as the risk of death isn't very easy to quantify. It does make sense though that smarter people would have a lower risk of death because they probably wouldn't be crushed by an airplane or fall off their roof.

Survival instinct isn't learned but reducing risks should be part of the learning process otherwise luck would factor greatly into the outcome of the study. The difference between those with a higher IQ and those with a lower IQ can't be that great biologically, which lends itself to question the health lectures we receive week after week from other scientists.

While exercise and diet obviously affect people's health, the intelligence to choose how to live one's life matters. If intelligence matters then some people are automatically at a disadvantage. It also means those crazy old people actually could have been smart back in the day. Even though your great-grandma might repeat the same stories if you talk to her for more than 30 minutes, she obviously wasn't a stupid person throughout her life if she has made it through more than 90 years.

So if someone wants their kids to live longer they should probably figure out how to up their child's IQ when they're young. Everyone has different ideas on how the brain works and matures but there are a couple of ways that no one seems to argue.

The state of Georgia passed a law almost 10 years ago giving a free compact disc of classical music to expecting mothers so they could play it during pregnancy and in the early years of the child's life. This was based on the assumption that classical music helps to form the brain and makes smarter children.

Also the sooner a child can read the sooner they will be able to gain knowledge on their own. Why wait for elementary school? Those two years from age 3 to 5 could be spent at least whetting their whistle when it comes to the alphabet, words or reading for that matter. It just might result in a life lived 40 percent longer.

In the very least it would make people smarter. The literacy rate is pretty high in the U.S. but why don't we have an IQ rate? Everyone would be better off if people were smarter, plain and simple. Maybe we'd be better drivers, maybe people wouldn't spend the better part of their 20s in college and maybe there would be politicians who knew what they were doing.

The fountain of youth may not really exist but if the smarter you are the longer you'll live people should probably try to get smarter instead of spending their time doing things that aren't very beneficial.

NW
CC

Copyright 1997-2005 Utah State University Department of Journalism & Communication, Logan UT 84322, (435) 797-1000
Best viewed 800 x 600.